Evaluation (Quantitative)

Depending on the content and delivery modalities, various kinds of questionnaires were administered to the doctor participants to gauge the effectiveness of the training sessions. More specifically, participants responded to Likert-type items and indicated the perceived extent to which they had benefited from the training in accordance with the knowledge-attitude-behavior framework, as well as rated their level of satisfaction with the sessions. Results show that, in general, participants had improved knowledge and skills, and became more confident and motivated to initiate and conduct end-of-life conversations.

The following tables depict some of the evaluation results obtained from the second and third phases of the project.

Quantitative Evaluation Results of Training for Doctors (Phase 2)

DomainItemNMSD
KnowledgeIncrease knowledge of EoL care
Clarify misconceptions about EoL care
Raise awareness of EoL care
Improve skills in communicating with EoL patients and their family members
191
108
107
108
3.84
4.12
4.25
4.16
0.73
0.64
0.53
0.57
AttitudeImprove confidence in communicating with EoL patients and their family members
Increase motivation to initiate EoL conversations
190
107
3.76
4.04
0.75
0.66
BehaviorInitiate more EoL conversations1883.650.80
SatisfactionThe training is relevant
The training is important
The training is useful
The quality of the training is good
191
191
191
187
3.85
3.91
3.92
4.12
0.79
0.79
0.78
0.65

Quantitative Evaluation Results of Training for Doctors (Tentative Figures for Phase 3)

DomainItemNMSD
KnowledgeIncrease knowledge of EoL care
Clarify misconceptions about EoL care
Raise awareness of EoL care
Improve skills in communicating with EoL patients and their family members
132
132
132
132
4.24
4.15
4.33
4.26
0.60
0.60
0.62
0.61
AttitudeImprove confidence in communicating with EoL patients and their family members
Increase motivation to initiate EoL conversations
132
132
4.00
4.08
0.71
0.76
BehaviorInitiate more EoL conversations1323.850.80
SatisfactionThe training is relevant
The training is important
The training is useful
The quality of the training is good
132
132
132
132
3.92
3.92
4.00
4.22
0.71
0.71
0.64
0.62
Note. Participants rated the extent to which they agreed with each of the above items (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree). Results are aggregated, whenever applicable, across all training sessions. N = sample size; M = mean; SD = standard deviation; EoL = end-of-life.